Showing posts with label SEBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SEBI. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

ULIPs under regulation solely by IRDA

Dear Policyholders,
  The ULIP related controversy has ended with Govt of India issuing a notification regarding ULIPs that this product will remain under regulation solely by IRDA.You may recall that when the SEBI had tried to be spoilsport for the most successful product with Insurance Companies, I had given you the word of assurance that SEBI would not be successful in its attempt. In fact SEBI's move was in bad taste and it seemed to me that it was acting at the behest of some lobby but how can one surely say so. So, now when the ULIPs are not under cloud anymore, you should be making use of this wonderful product for your investment needs.
  I am happy to report the Growth Fund (Life) Unit's NAV has crossed 80 point mark on 21st June '10 . This is exactly 4 times the par value Rs 20 in Jan 04 when Nifty was at 2000 level. To have quadrupled the value in just 6 1/2 years is a remarkable feat. It translates in to return of almost 23% per year on compounded basis. Where else in the world such an achievement may have been made. This is superior to returns in any other asset class over the same period including Realty and Bullion.
  To further enhance your returns, I give fund switching advice from time to time which might have helped you. You may, however, master about the fund decision and my advice is no compulsion. You should be taking into account your own risk appetite and impressions about the possibilities before you resort to fund-switching. However, i am at your service at all times.
Krishna Kumar Khandelwal

Saturday, April 17, 2010

SEBI and IRDA tug of war for ULIPs

Dear Policy Holders,

A raging war is going on between the two regulators
ie SEBI and IRDA . SEBI says that its going to be its own baby for nursing and looking after as ULIPs has a bigger element of stock market exposure. IRDA contends that it is primarily an insurance product. I would side IRDA for various reasons. The main reason is that the insurance is a much more tricky business. The liabilities are not easily determinable on the part of companies. Only highly qualified actuaries may do it for them. There has to specialised knowledge about how the premiums are fixed and how the eventual liabilities are going to be provided for. I do not think that SEBI can match up the requirement of being a body fit to regulate insurance.

I have come across material in press and on TV programmes which have tried to throw bad light on
ULIPs on account of transparency issue and also on issue of commissions. In fact, I have been educating you all about the virtues of ULIP products. It stands absolutely transparent where every single charge and possible returns are shown separately in the illustrations (IRDA has prescribed format). Also the commission is minimal in these plans which allow only under 1% commission from second or third year on the premiums paid while the traditional plans which LIC has been selling for more than fifty years bring commissions of 5% on premiums over the life time of policy besides the first year commission is much more than in ULIPs.

There is some lobby behind the efforts at tarnishing the image of a product that has been much popular with public. It has all good features and none bad. I am ready to explain to policy holders if they let me know of the point they want to clear doubts about.

Would it not impress you that most of my
ULIP holders have had a very satisfying returns which have been as high as 30% per annum and none have had it less than interest on FDs with bank. Needless to say that the returns have been tax free unlike interest on FDs.

The govt has
clarified that the ULIPs already issued will stay unaffected. Whatever the regulators and courts finalise in the area of regulation of ULIPs will only be applicable to new offerings of the products.

Those interested may go for the exiting products of
HDFC SLIC which I assure you are with low charges and good possibility of returns which has practically been the case with my present policy holders including you, if you hold a policy from me.

I do hope that those of you have substantial funds under your policy, are paying due attention my switching advices from time to time.

Krishna Kumar Khandelwal